tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18740044.post115604130596406935..comments2023-11-05T05:55:08.294-04:00Comments on THIS IS NOT ->Delawareliberal: How in God's name can Michael Castle Support this shit?jasonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07119892776164779402noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18740044.post-1156274833658076442006-08-22T15:27:00.000-04:002006-08-22T15:27:00.000-04:00I'm sure the Campaign interns who pulled sign duty...I'm sure the Campaign interns who pulled sign duty are praying for rain. It is a joy to drive fence posts into sunbaked earth!<BR/><BR/>on the plus side, they will return to college with a tan and muscles.<BR/><BR/>The phrase "return to college" offers a clue as to why Castle signs go up in late august...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18740044.post-1156219832290872922006-08-22T00:10:00.000-04:002006-08-22T00:10:00.000-04:00I'll go for the more benign part of your post - th...I'll go for the more benign part of your post - the Castle signs. Really, who has out-signed Castle since he first ran for Governor? You're really not revealing anything with that. Kinda shows how you'll attempt the most useless arguments to support your stance. Sort of like condemning David Crossan to Iraq because he is GOPer like you are a Dem. How's that research paper going?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18740044.post-1156191586159177542006-08-21T16:19:00.000-04:002006-08-21T16:19:00.000-04:00Hube, here's a quote for you..."Even legal expert...Hube, here's a quote for you...<BR/><BR/>"Even legal experts who agreed with a federal judge's conclusion on Thursday that a National Security Agency surveillance program is unlawful were distancing themselves from the decision's reasoning and rhetoric yesterday. They said the opinion overlooked important precedents, failed to engage the government's major arguments, used circular reasoning, substituted passion for analysis and did not even offer the best reasons for its own conclusions. Discomfort with the quality of the decision is almost universal, said Howard J. Bashman . . ."-- news story http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/19/washington/19ruling.html?ex=1313640000&en=5f8f4ba4ca8ad621&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss , New York Times, Aug. 19Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18740044.post-1156168895111729532006-08-21T10:01:00.000-04:002006-08-21T10:01:00.000-04:00once more for the slow kids in the back of the cla...once more for the slow kids in the back of the class:<BR/> <BR/>"warrentless wiretaps"<BR/><BR/>not exactly...<BR/><BR/>the NSA is authorized by our Gov. to spy on the entire world - outside the USA.<BR/><BR/>in effect the NSA has a warrent to wiretap.<BR/><BR/>in regular police work, a wiretap warrant only covers one party in the conversation. <BR/><BR/>So if I have a warrant to tap Jason's phone, I am not limited to listening to his "side" of the converstion. I also record the voices and tel#'s of the people Jason calls and is called by.<BR/><BR/>Likewise, the NSA has a "warrant" to tap Bin Ladin's phone and the administration believes they are auhorized to record both sides of the conversation, even if one side is in the USA.<BR/><BR/>What the Anti-NSA crowd (Jason,ACLU) are saying is that when Bin Ladin inc. talks to someone in Jordan, we can listen but when they talk to someone in the USA, we should turn off the wiretap.<BR/><BR/>This is irrational and it makes us less safe.<BR/><BR/>(borrowed from steamboat willy)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18740044.post-1156124901226559762006-08-20T21:48:00.000-04:002006-08-20T21:48:00.000-04:00Sorry Hube. The "even those sympathetic to the ju...Sorry Hube. The <I>"even those sympathetic to the judge's decision thought her reasoning was pathetic"</I> line that Fox News has taken up does not change the fact that Mehlman is calling on Americans to support illegal behavior. <BR/><BR/>What if Fox News decides that "red lights" are for suckers. <BR/><BR/>Then where would we be.jasonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07119892776164779402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18740044.post-1156091347958646432006-08-20T12:29:00.000-04:002006-08-20T12:29:00.000-04:00spying on terrorists makes us safer.That is why we...<I>spying on terrorists makes us safer.</I><BR/><BR/>That is why we have legal ways to spy on them. <BR/><BR/>Hp - what ever happened to real conservatives? You know...the ones who thought that wrecking the Constitution was a bad idea. Where are they on this? <BR/><BR/>I happen to think that the people who but want us safer and less free are poor excuses for Americans and not real conservatives at heart.jasonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07119892776164779402noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18740044.post-1156085087900188512006-08-20T10:44:00.000-04:002006-08-20T10:44:00.000-04:00Do you still play with yourself when you write?Do you still play with yourself when you write?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18740044.post-1156084205984127792006-08-20T10:30:00.000-04:002006-08-20T10:30:00.000-04:00spying on terrorists makes us safer.spying on terrorists makes us safer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com